Document Analysis The Marriage of the Virgin Essay

I have elect The unification of the virgin as a docu manpowert analysis because I emergency to contrast this score with litigates of Perugino, speci in ally Christ giving the Keys to St shaft of light (1481-1482) and in like manner The Marriage of the Virgin (1500-1504). Raphael was commissi wholenessd to fetch the turn tail by the Albizzini family of Citta di Castello (scala 8) for the chapel of St Joseph in the Church of San Francesco. In comparison to the twain works of Perugino the similarities are easily recognised. until now although we stool date Peruginos precedent work between 1481and1482, his Marriage of the Virgin stand only be go out from between 1500 and 1504. Raphael helpfully named himself and dated his work in the middle of the temple and so we know definitely it was finished in 1504, so although it would chit-chatm likely, one should be cautious to date Peruginos Marriage of the Virgin preceding than Raphaels.In 1504 Raphael was twenty dollar bill o ne years old and was distillery an apprentice in the school of Perugino,and he executed it prior to his stay in Florence, and so it is natural to assume his work was still greatly influenced by his master. The depiction has significant parallels with the Christ giving the Keys to St Peter in the Sistine Chapel. As in the earlier fresco, Raphael uses the same structural format. The marquee is the commanding central focus which gives the depth of the face in relation to the figures of the foreground. The figures between the pavilion and the frontal scene is proportional in size and shows Raphaels confidence in the use of perspective. The landscape shows the influence of Perugino, the mantrap may get a intelligence of tranquility and stillness which one may also sort with the actual landscapes of Umbria, and dissertation from experience I certainly did.When looking in detail at the figures in the foreground one can see the influence of Perugino within the faces of the ch aracters. The faces of the ladies and indeed the men either side of the Joseph and Mary all have the serene, graceful and introspective qualities one would associate with Perugino. The ladies with their small mouths seem heavy to differentiate from Peruginos own figures.From these similarities it may be said that at this time Raphael was truly a disciple of Perugino and puma in his mood.Although there is much to associate Raphael with the school of Perugino within this painting, there can also be seen that within the work Raphael has started to move away from his masters style and also out-master the masterBruno Santi in Raphael, The long Masters of Art (p10) writes of Raphaels high quality in the use of Perspective in comparison to Perugino. He cites Peruginos fresco in the Sistine chapel is actual horizontally which is characteristic of the Quattrocento whereas Raphael uses a well developed circular composition. The temple in Raphaels representation is a polygonal edifice seemingly more complex than Peruginos temple but perfectly portray and gives one a sense of Raphaels complete confidence of the new architectural designs which were emerging through people such(prenominal) as Bramante and Da Vinci and it has been argued that their influence can be seen in this work.