European Integration Essay -- essays research papers

     after the tragedies of World War II, atomic number 63an leaders have made strive efforts to prevent such a catastrophic event from occurring on their simple a prepare. The best solution seemed to be highly mechanized cooperation among the highest European powers to envision that future appointment, and perhaps war, could not arise between them. If every last(predicate) the states ran themselves in a manner cooperating with their neighbors, conflict could be avoided. To prevent another(prenominal) nations from not cooperating, treaties and institutions would have to be designed for each area of international rice beer such as condescension, communications, security, and so forth. As the century progressed, more than organizations, institutions and associations were certain and soon leaders recognized that maybe more unafraid could sleep to enchanther to Europe as a whole if cooperation as such could let and eventually arrive at full European con solidation.     The establishment of the European Union in November 1993 reoriented the European movement . The union incorporates a good portion of Western Europe and fundamentally acts as an enforcer of all the agreements the included nations make with each other in terms of trade and the economic, political, and social stabilization of the entire continent . As we seem to get closer to Europes achieving integration, the actual possibility of it ever truly occurring has been in constant question among scholars. Liberals believe that cooperation on the level of integration is very possible and probably, as each nation essentially desires to increase its witness individual gains, and each nation gains more by cooperating more and banding together as one state. However, as constructivists cue us, we cannot neglect the element of identity in this equation. Thereafter, we must recognize that late it is more hot for nations to fight for their own established id entity quite a than to create a new one for the good of maintaining peace in their new state as we have seen in so some Eastern European countries. Therefore, as realists would agree, integration is in reality unworkable due to the trend of nations to protect their individual sovereignty and at the charge of losing it, move towards more patriotic regimes.      Liberals believe that nations inherently wish to collaborate as it benefits both actor... ...ative gains. They can never know each others intentions, and wont risk the cooperation if they think they can gain more in the future from conflicting.      Furthermore, as in the Balkans or in Russia we have seen how disinclined nations or ethnic groups are to ignore their own unique national identity in order to create a new identity of the newly established state. Richard Caplan and John Feffer note that, nationalism has been embraced as a bulwark against the erosion of cultural divers ity and popular sovereignty in the face of creeping federalism . New ethnic conflict arises and peace is far from realized as a result of integration. The potency European integration would suffer a similar and well-nigh likely greater effect. In the long run, integration, if actualized, would not lead to a cool and trusting state as hoped, but instead a firebrand new set of ethnic and nationalist conflict. This is a risk most states are probably not willing to take.     As we have seen on smaller scales in newly integrated democratic states in Europe today, nationalism is not a dying epidemic. In fact, ethnic and nationalist conflicts